“Information, information, information…without good information, Gabriel, how can I possibly make good decisions???” — Lord God, Creation Story Verbatim
Anytime you add or subtract information from the surface of a Primitive Object, which is what most things are, no matter what they look like, including me and you and Tiffany here, it changes the object, “Heisenbergs” it, in a way… I’ll explain:
Take an object, any object, and describe it as a simple undifferentiated cube with no distinguishing characteristics at the moment.
Okay, now stuff the cube full of something — anything. It goes into the “contents”, which is to say, it is added to, and distributed by negentropy into small groupings or “bundles” and embedded into the surface — not the skin — of the cube. Some part of these “instructions” or “information” says that the cube now looks like a sphere.
All Particles (Cubes) act as Black Holes in respect to incoming information by accumulating the information and distributing it unevenly within its surface.
We can add yet more or entirely different information and make the cube look like Tiffany, or Gorby or both, but that’s another story involving quantum mechanics like the kind of calculations and theory that you would be forced to confront in a final exam. Information can be “stacked” or layered.
Information embedded in the surface of the particle isn’t necessarily flattened, but it can be, in the interest of Conservation of Information, a standard that Stephen hasn’t yet broken, and he won’t ever. The Conservation of Information is not destroyed by a Black Hole, the observational evidence isn’t yet in to support my position, but it’s on the way shortly.
I no longer teach in the official “Public Education System”, a double oxymoron if ever there was one, so I no longer am required to quantize the amount of education per day that the student has achieved; therefore I don’t concern myself with details. I’m more interested in whether or not you grasped the core of the concept.
Narcissistic.
I have nothing to say about Narcissists or Narcissistic (try to say that three times without your tongue landing somewhere between nose & throat) today — I just thought it might add some traffic if I happened to add the words “narcissist” and “narcissistic” into the words that are included in the “tags” section of this blog.
Sure, it’s a joke, but it also clearly demonstrates “stacking”, an important part of APPLIED Information Theory — you can see that adding this tiny word “narcissistic” does something definitely provable to the original item — it promises, but probably realistically will not actually deliver, more traffic to this specific page and no other.
Okay, I guess I could mention that many cultures hold Narcissism to be a man’s privilege and household right, and in those cultures, it isn’t considered weird or strange or negative to forbid a woman to express herself creatively except through household crafts, such as spinning, weaving, sewing, knitting, candlemaking, patchwork quilting, paper arts, needlepoint, doilies, doll clothing, cooking, cleaning & soccer and shopping runs.
Admittedly, there is a lot there for a heavily suppressed woman to do without crossing the line that threatens the male ego, but what if you want to cross that line, join the men’s club and do whatever the hell you feel like doing, as long as it’s legal???
That’s when the proverbial shit hits the equally proverbial fan.
Women can’t do what men can do. It starts with walking around shirtless in public, and goes on to peeing anywhere you feel like it, and dressing warmly while the women freeze their tits off just to please the men, because there’s nothing like mommy’s titty to turn a man on, and make him ready to crawl and beg for mercy, but I digress…
Let’s add the information of the red dress onto Tiffany’s well-formed rendering generated onto the location of her cube — we could change the location of just the rendering and leave the cube there, but typically, we don’t. There are lots of good reasons for how we handle apparent object location, but that’s a matter for the advanced blueline course and the BlueLine Academy is far away from where you are at the moment, so let’s just sail on past that issue.
Add the information painted on the dress that Tiffany is wearing, and even more alteration of the cube’s apparent reality will obtain. Now add to that that the dress was painted on a human body, not a dummy form, and this UNSEEN FORCE adds a definite twist to the resultant formulaic underpinnings of the whole thing, meaning Tiffany + Dress + Painted Image on/in Dress.
On/In Dress, meaning that the gold fabric ink has distributed itself into the fabric of the dress, not merely coated the surface. This embedment is an important part of Information Theory, and should not be overlooked when calculating formulae or postulating sub-theory.
I’m not including underwear, although we’re both wearing same, plus footwear, earrings, necklace, styled or messy hair and in this case, White Lightning Musk Oil, which is another way of altering the information on the Surface of the Cube.
Every Particle Contains a Black Hole.
Black Holes are how gravity gets put into the works. If you come up with a better solution, let me know — that’s one of the reasons for this simulation.
Okay, so the Cube remains exactly the same; how come it feels different and the contact points are different?
The contact points are a generated field of conformed points defining a patterned surface with an associated bump at that radius from both loci. The local effect is that one has encountered a physical object and bounced off it, or they mutually bounced, depending on relative mass and level of inertia — I prefer to call this effect “Inertness” rather than “inertia”, but I’m outvoted by the general physics population, so what the hell, “inertia” it is.
One can maneuver an object around the grid board, but it’s pointless. Sorry, couldn’t help that little bit of math-humor, although considering all the mathematicians I’ve known, few of them would appreciate a detour into a potentially emotional space, however slight.
You’ll note that the dress on the Drummer Tiffany is now black with a different set of symbols painted on it. This plus the drum kit tells us that this is a different universe, even though it seems connected to the previous “Red Dress” universe.
Gorby is not in this “Tiffany in Black & Gold Dress with Drum Kit” universe, nor the guns and saddle & tack. These elements are all part of the information in the space — in this case, the space can be defined in script format:
BARN — INTERIOR: We see a drum set and background on a small stage, perhaps the home of some local geezer band. There is a microphone and we can just see the top half of a 1956 Vintage Stratocaster guitar resting on a stand. Stage Left we see a keyboard on top of which rests a guitar capo and tuner.
All this and more would form the “information” that becomes a television or movie script which would then be interpreted by the director and actors and set dressers and camera and sound operators and lighting technicians and prompters and more to organize into sub-group categories and develop a setting in which the film can be filmed and experienced by you as what you laughingly call “REALITY”.
Sorry it took so long to get back to this blog — it took me ten minutes to stop laughing.
Um, okay, serious face… I have no idea how to make any of those idiotic keystroke faces, nor am I rushed for time to such a degree that I can’t simply take the few extra moments to write it out, and I’m not entirely certain that there is a standard “serious face”, but knowing humans of Planet Urth, I can assert it without supporting documentary evidence.
So here’s another photo by Michele de Paris of Tiffany, this time sporting about with a tambourine and a wild feather hairdo by LeslieAnn of Grass Valley. Here we see a red dress, but it’s different — at least the gold painting is different — it has a Guardian Angel on the front. We still see the background painting of Cosmo Street, the guitar and the mike and the drum kit are still somewhat partly in evidence.
The INFORMATION in the space is the only thing that has actually changed.
Hard to wrap the mind around that, eh? Try tackling it without a mind, you’ll do incomparably better.
Is there life after the mind?
Tune in today to find out. Oops..almost forgot…in fact, I did forget, and then just by chance, happened to remember during the course of proofreading this blog that I had forgotten…to add the word “narcissistic” to the tags. As you can easily obtain, I might have continued to forget had it not been for the triggering mechanism of the aforementioned paragraph containing the word in question… Pardon me a moment while I pop the computer’s attention over to the “tags” field…
Now I’ll use the mouse to indicate that its Avatar, the Cursor, has moved over to the bottom of the “enter text” field of the blog thingy.
Okay, I can now report that the “narcissism” and “narcissistic” tags have been added to the “tags” section, thus completing this blog, so without further ado, I’ll get back to work setting up the stage for the morning broadcast. We’ll talk more about all these things or something entirely different, so be sure to catch the drift, at this morning’s session, mostly during the earlier part. I like to start right in at 6:30 sharp, if you’re wondering whether you’re missing anything and yes, there was a minor shift, but a Major Shift is on the way.
If you’re worrying if the Narcissistic thing applies to you, you probably aren’t.
See You At The Top!!!
LeslieAnn