5-Star KFC?

Virtual Sculpture in the GoDD engine, by ej gold — you can build your own!

What Is “Soft Secession”?

“Soft secession” isn’t the kind of dramatic, fireworks-level breakaway you might picture. It’s more like a state gradually drifting away from federal control — opting out of certain responsibilities, withholding cooperation, and building its own systems — without ever formally declaring independence.

How It Works

At its core, soft secession is about withholding cooperation. Thanks to legal precedent (the anti-commandeering doctrine), the federal government can’t force states to enforce federal law. A state can simply stop helping. In practice, that could mean:

  • Refusing to enforce federal immigration or drug laws.

  • Declining to implement federal ID, health, or education programs.

  • Setting up state-run alternatives to reduce reliance on Washington.

  • Withholding or delaying certain funds normally collected and remitted to the feds.

Instead of a clean break, it’s a slow and steady shrugging off of federal influence.

Why California?

California has leverage because it’s a donor state: it sends far more to Washington in federal taxes than it gets back in spending. That imbalance often runs into tens of billions of dollars a year. In plain terms, California is subsidizing other states.

That makes the state uniquely positioned to say: “We keep more of what we generate, and you figure out how to live without it.”

What Could Trigger It?

  • Growing frustration with federal mandates (immigration, environment, healthcare).

  • A state budget strong enough to go it alone.

  • Rising political will — leaders and voters wanting more autonomy.

  • Coordination with other donor states (New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois) who are also sending out more than they get back.

Withholding Funds as Leverage

The sharpest tool in soft secession is money. California could begin by selectively withholding funds, slowing remittances, or diverting money into state-controlled programs. Even the threat of this action would highlight California’s outsized contribution and force a national debate.

It wouldn’t be a formal “CalExit.” Instead, it’s a gradual, deliberate drift away — one funding stream, one policy area at a time.

==========================================================================

Here’s the Bardo bus, right on time/space! All aboard!

==========================================================================

See You At The Top!!!

gorby